35 Days left to seek lead plaintiff status.

The complaint alleges the defendants made statements that were false and/or misleading at the time they were made because: (1) the ERP implementation was important to Vital Farms’ operations, and “management and key crew members” had been investing “significant” time and attention to this roll-out; (2) by the time the 3Q 2025 10-Q was filed, the ERP was already implemented, and there had been “slowed down production” as a result of implementing the ERP; (3) as such, even if the slowdown occurred in the first two weeks of the fourth quarter of 2025, the risk disclosure concerning the ERP implementation was deficient, as the delay was more than a hypothetical at this point; (4) Defendants, who had never before warned investors that production would slow down as a result of implementing the ERP, suddenly alleged that said slowdown was “always part of our plan”; (5) rather than admit the impact of the slowed production on Vital Farm’s operations, Defendants misled investors by saying “the business has quickly bounced back and we are now operating at pre go live shipment levels”; (6) indeed, rather than warn investors of the impact of the slowed production, Defendants stated the slowdown “had no impact on our guidance for the full year” and even increased their 2025 guidance from $770,000,000 to $775,000,000; and (7) as a result of the delay in shipments and/or production, Vital Farms would lose important retail shelf space, which would negatively impact Vital Farms’ business and operations.

Vital Farms Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: VITL) Claim Form